On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:24 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le mercredi 27 février 2008 à 15:13 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit : > > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 13:41 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: > > > Le vendredi 22 février 2008 à 15:43 -0500, David Zeuthen a écrit : > > > > Hey Alex, > > > > > > > > (Hi i18n team: there's a string break request near the end of this > > > > mail) > > > > > > > > Here are some updated patches > > > > > > > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/nautilus-fixes-2.patch > > > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gvfs-fixes-2.patch > > > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/gio-fixes-2.patch > > > > > > > > New fixes that weren't in the earlier patch set > > > > > > > > - Only consider mounts under /media and $HOME to be user visible. This > > > > makes it a lot easier for users to understand what they have to do > > > > if they want to hide or show a mount point. And users have been very > > > > loud about this issue. Also revert the commit where we hide NFS > > > > mounts; if the user don't want NFS mounts to be shown they just need > > > > to mount them outside /media. Or if they want it shown they need to > > > > mount it inside /media. (It would be weird to mount NFS stuff > > > > in /media anyway) > > > > > > Please, also monitor stuff in /mnt (it has been discussed at length on > > > #nautilus). > > > > I really think this should be a --configure option as its kinda a > > distribution decision. Can you whip up a patch for that? > > Well, it should be /mnt AND /media and $HOME. I don't really see the > need for a configure patch..
I'm not sure everyone wants everything under /mnt show up as "user visisble" volumes. Its an old-style unix thing and may well contain "implementation-specific" mountpoints that are symlinked into from other places (something /usr -> /mnt/hdb1/usr for instance). I'll let davidz reply with his opinions on this. -- nautilus-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
