On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 11:20 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote: > Alexander: > > > We've never thought much about this. Extensions are only linked to a > > LGPL library, but that is a very thin API that redirects to the > > implementation which is mainly GPL. I think this means that the > > extensions have to be GPL or at least GPL compatible, but IANAL. > > Since this is a public integration point, it seems the documentation > should make this a bit more clear. At the very least, it should be > documented that extensions link against LGPL, so a plugin shouldn't > be written with a LGPL incompatible license seems the sort of minimal > documentation that would be useful. Should there be something like > a COPYING.PLUGINS file that could make this more clear?
I added this: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/nautilus/tree/COPYING.EXTENSIONS -- nautilus-list mailing list nautilus-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
