Oh, just noticed your confusing me. you have actually patches for both issues.

In that case. i agree on the patch that fixes the the small images
getting scaled but i don't agree on no frame for images with alpha.
Just imagine a image with just one transparent pixel somewhere.. would
that suddenly be without a frame? would look odd i think. Specially in
a big folder with jpeg and png images.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Jaap A. Haitsma <j...@haitsma.org> wrote:
> Very small patch that doesn't show a frame around images with an alpha
> plane which makes the images look a lot better
>
> It's actually a modification of this patch which I committed a wile ago
>
> commit 2a94803b44010e3c47a9f7b94894fab8d6062abc
> Author: Jaap A. Haitsma <j...@haitsma.org>
> Date:   Sat Jul 18 20:45:05 2009 +0200
>
>    Fix handling of small images/icons
>
>    Small images with an alpha plane don't get a frame
>    Use different scaling strategy for small images. Small images/icons
>    won't get up scaled in default zoom view. They are shown in their actual
>    Fixes bug #585186
>
>
> Can I commit the attached patch?
>
> Jaap
>
> --
> nautilus-list mailing list
> nautilus-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
>
-- 
nautilus-list mailing list
nautilus-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list

Reply via email to