Roland McGrath <rol...@hack.frob.com> wrote: > I have no comment on the functionality. But "xstat" is probably a poor > choice of name. There is precedent for that function name with different > meaning in the userland APIs. (It's a moderately useless meaning inherited > from SVR4, but regardless overloading a name previously used is unwise.)
I've no particular attachment to the name 'xstat'. If you'd prefer 'statx' I could go for that. David -- nautilus-list mailing list nautilus-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
