2013/10/26 Colomban Wendling <lists....@herbesfolles.org> > It wouldn't be so frustrating if *NEW* reports asking for the tree view > to come back weren't closed as "duplicates" of the *very opposite report > that REMOVED it* with no further explanation. >
I'm sorry, I did not foresee this misunderstanding and I can understand why you found it frustrating. I agree that bug 697739 being marked as a duplicate of bug 676897 is unfortunately misleading. It may have been by mistake. However, it would not be nice of me to go and overwrite the resolution set by a maintainer of the product. But the above quote is also unfair in its oversimplification of the situation, because I did not mark you bug report as a duplicate of a "very opposite report". I marked it as a duplicate of bug 697739 and I stand that, while it is not a literal duplicate, the underlying "bug" – missing tree sidebar – is the same, hence a duplicate. Despite that, in order to avoid further misunderstanding, and given your emphasis on it being a feature request rather than a missing feature report, I'm revert your report to UNCONFIRMED status. (Not that it makes much of a difference, other than a bureaucratic one; it is not my role to make a decision feature requests.)
-- nautilus-list mailing list nautilus-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
