It seems that some people edit other's messages with that tool.
El 27/3/19 a les 12:04, Neil McGovern via GNOME Discourse ha escrit: > [nmcgovern] nmcgovern <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/nmcgovern> Neil > McGovern <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/nmcgovern> Foundation Staff > March 27 > > That’s not what the post originally said, it’s been edited. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Visit Topic > <https://discourse.gnome.org/t/gitg-finding-missing-features/597/7> or > reply to this email to respond. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > In Reply To > > [p.sun.fun] p.sun.fun <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/p.sun.fun> Pavlo > Solntsev <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/p.sun.fun> > March 26 > > I think it is valid. I will explain why. GitLab tracks problem with > package. But @albfan <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/albfan> is asking > what functionality is missed that prevent you to use the package. People > may use CLI, other product or gitg. So question is why not gitg? I think > it is worth to get opinion from the public. Best, > > > Previous Replies > > [p.sun.fun] p.sun.fun <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/p.sun.fun> Pavlo > Solntsev <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/p.sun.fun> > March 26 > > I think it is valid. I will explain why. GitLab tracks problem with > package. But @albfan <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/albfan> is asking > what functionality is missed that prevent you to use the package. People > may use CLI, other product or gitg. So question is why not gitg? I think > it is worth to get opinion from the public. > > Best, > > [nmcgovern] nmcgovern <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/nmcgovern> Neil > McGovern <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/nmcgovern> Foundation Staff > March 26 > > I’ve added this for you :slight_smile: > > [nmcgovern] nmcgovern <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/nmcgovern> Neil > McGovern <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/nmcgovern> Foundation Staff > March 25 > > I’m not sure what you’re after here. This seems mostly already covered > in the Gitlab issue, right? > > Generally, if there’s info that needs adding, I would recommend > following up on the issue itself to prevent splitting the discussion. > > [albfan] albfan <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/albfan> Alberto Fanjul > <https://discourse.gnome.org/u/albfan> > March 25 > > If there’s something preventing you from use gitg, please tell us here > > See there’re existing open issues (rebase, pull, split view) but we are > looking here for new ideas to increase the user audience for gitg > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Visit Topic > <https://discourse.gnome.org/t/gitg-finding-missing-features/597/7> or > reply to this email to respond. > > You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. > > To unsubscribe from these emails, click here > <https://discourse.gnome.org/email/unsubscribe/66095794216cd0506dc1ddc8b8c2ba201f7679f228766901995aa864666ade7d>. > -- nautilus-list mailing list nautilus-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list
