Am 28.05.2005 um 13:36 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
To be compatible, the type specifier would have to be the third arg, but then you couldn't specify the type without also specifying a default. I don't see a clean way to do it...
Hm.. so you are after
arg {arg val} args
type of compatibility as in Tcl proc? I did not think about that
because we are using our own parser. What is the benefit/reason
to maintain this kind of compatibility when we already preprocess
args ourselves?
Zoran
