On 19.09.2006, at 15:32, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
I like the idea of extending ns_job to handle processes, this way
when i
create queue i define what kind it is: threads or processes and
then use
it same way, no need in eval command, ns_job queue submites script
to be
evaluated to the next avail thread/process
Yes. This what I also thought after seeing the similarities
between the two. Normally you should create a thread or process
queue and after that, it should be pretty generic i.e. the API
would hide the rest from you.
But Stephen has confused me with his last email about problems
in "eval" command, which I can't see.
