On 07/07/2011 12:07 PM, Flavio Pompermaier wrote: > I wrote my own AbstractNavTable (actually starting from the code of > NavTable) and paying some attention I'm able to edit values during > editing. > The problem of NavTable, from what I saw, is that it relies on the > recordset of a layer. This is wrong during edition, because > layer.getRecordset() is different from layer.getSource.getRecordset(). > This is also the cause of the error of non-updated fieldNames if a > column is removed from the table structure. >
Flavio, I'll have a look on that during next codesprint [1]. Nevertheless, I'd be more than happy if you pull together an example demonstrating it. I would review that patch and, if all is ok, will commit it to our repo. Let me know if you need any help to produce the patch. best, amaneiro [1] http://doowikis.com/m/oXmrqoFIM1 _______________________________________________ Navtable-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.forge.osor.eu/listinfo/navtable-devel
