> I've seen socat, and I could use it as you described. My only > objection to this solution is that there is an unneeded process in the > middle that just pipes data around... > > (Instead of socat, I think it would be more efficient to just write > a simple application that uses the "new" Linux syscall "splice" that > I've just found by mistake yesterday...)
In that case you need to fix socat to use splice() when available. I have a hard time believing socat adds measurable overhead, especially if you're already tunnelling over ssh. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
