On 6 Feb 2013, at 21:38, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > This situation is of course different if the server is not using a > fork-per-client paradigm; but since that's what we're doing, I fail to > see any benefit in ignoring SIGPIPE, while there is some benefit to be > had in not ignoring it.
OK - so this is assuming you fork prior to the negotiation? In which case no objections here assuming we never do any activity on any /other/ fd which is likely to cause a SIGPIPE. If you kill syslogd, does logging stuff to syslog ever cause a SIGPIPE for instance? It would be bad if failure to log something caused a disk to drop off. -- Alex Bligh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
