On 29-03-13 17:01, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On 29-03-13 15:30, Paul Clements wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:36 PM, folkert <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Very good. Would it be at all possible to try the attached patch, >>>> which includes some additional debugging information, so that we can >>>> see why this is happening? >>> >>> It is unclear which process is the trigger: >>> >>> [ 71.078260] got ERESTARTSYS: sig:17 code:262145 sender:2853 >> >> OK, so sig 17 is SIGCHLD??? > > AAAARGh! > >> This is weird. I'm not that familiar with >> latest upstream nbd-client, but is there maybe some fork or thread >> that is happening? > > Yes, that's for the partitioning stuff. Originally I had the parent do > that, but then the "-nofork" parameter would behave counterintuitive. > > Now we fork(), but that obviously means I need to eat SIGCHLD. Sigh.
Actually, I am eating SIGCHLD; nbd-client.c, line 607. I suppose we can't deal with this any other way? -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2 _______________________________________________ Nbd-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
