On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 08:35:19AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>
> On 18 Apr 2016, at 20:49, Eric Blake <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bligh <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> doc/proto.md | 10 ++++------
> >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> This one is my preferred fix.
> >
> > Also my preferred fix; my recent patch proposal for
> > NBD_REP_ERR_BLOCK_SIZE_REQD is yet another case where strict lockstep
> > between client requests and server responses makes life easier to reason
> > about on whether a server will be using the error message in response to
> > NBD_OPT_INFO, based on whether it has already seen NBD_OPT_BLOCK_SIZE.
>
> Let's see if we can persuade Wouter :-)
After having given this some thought over the past two (very busy :-/)
days, you have. Let's go with this.
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
_______________________________________________
Nbd-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
