All,following the below announcement and that the comment period ended today, we will continue with the process as per below and I will ask the RIPE NCC to publish the process below on the NCC Services WG page. - kurtis - On 5 May 2015, at 15:54, Lindqvist Kurt Erik wrote: > All, > > in London we discussed the chair selection process without much feedback. I > promised to write up the slides I had made in text and send to list and we > would then follow that process. The process outlined in London was as follows > : > > RIPE NCC-Services WG Chair Selection process > > The RIPE NCC Services WG shall have at least two Working Group chairs and a > maximum of three. The RIPE NCC Services WG Chairs are selected for a two year > period, and one of the chairs will stand down every year. The chair not > standing down shall make a call for interested parties on the RIPE NCC > Services WG mailing list. Interested parties then have a two week period to > make their interest known. After this, the chair(s) not up for selection will > issue a two week discussion period where the RIPE NCC Services WG community > can express approval or otherwise for the candidates that have expressed > interest. At the end of the two week discussion period the chair(s) not up > for selection will call consensus for the candidate(s). Appeals will follow > the normal WG chair appeal process from the RIPE PDP. > > The little feedback we got on the mailing list and and the meeting I believe > is consensus., but I’d like to with this email start a two week last call on > the proposed process. We will have a brief a discussion in Amsterdam, and > then per the above start the call for nominees as per above. > > -- > Best regards, > > Lindqvist Kurt Erik > [email protected] -- Best regards, Lindqvist Kurt Erik [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
