On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:44:40PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:22:21AM +0000, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > On 18 Dec 2019, at 9:51, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > > > > The not-so-good news: current policy is to not make it available > > > because of privacy concerns. Unless there is pressure from the > > > community that is not likely to change soon. I am no lawyer but I > > > expect that this policy could change at least for data that is not > > > ???personal data???, which would be good enough for what you seek. But > > > I guess that more than two people have to ask for it. A reasonably > > > concise request from this WG would go a long way. > > > > I'm asking for this, so as to build the number towards "more than two". > > I hope that the WG will indeed make such a request. > > > > I believe that the data should be open enough to allow the question, > > "what is the matter with this address block?" (my paraphrase) to > > be answered, while still protecting personal data. > > This.
Count my support too. -- Piotr Strzyżewski
