James,

'Planning blight' is a phrase used by Matt earlier. Sorry I managed to separate 
my comments from your and his conversation (as I am new the to NDG technical 
list).

I see my deliverable in the 'revitalizing' project to be setting up the 
procedures to ensure that new DDS  can cope with change in a managed way, 
whereas the IA project (or another project if that's not the remit of the IA 
project?) will think about the changes that will be required for future the 
development of the DDS, thereby allowing the new DDS to evolve as required.

Kay


From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of James Doughty
Sent: 30 September 2010 10:42
To: NERC DataGrid Technical List
Cc: Thomas, David A; Brown, Mike J
Subject: Re: [ndg-technical] SIS Information Architecture - Business Processes 
and People - Configuration Management

Kay

New phrase to me is that there 'planning blight'. What do you actually mean by 
it?

In your second paragraph it sounds like the 'Revitalise Data Discovery Service' 
project is handling this specifically and as such I will refer to this in our 
summary. Clearly it is a very important process and should be included in the 
IA Implementation Plan in some shape or form.

Regards

James
On 30 September 2010 09:41, Thorne, Kay 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi James/Matt

As Matt mentions: 'With the "revitalized" service, we've got a new setup now, 
with the backend services (DWS, DPWS) completely separated from the front end 
portal (DDS, DPP). Clearly there's a need to ensure that updates to any of 
these 4 (and the vocab service) are managed together, but also to overcome 
planning blight and ensure that progress can be made with them when needed.'

The back-end services are hosted at CEDA and the front-end portal will be 
hosted at BODC. Consequently, it has already been recognized that the change 
management procedures are an important component of the 'revitalizing' project. 
Therefore the project brief contains the deliverable 'Produce protocol document 
to disseminate procedures and responsibilities for robust testing, routine 
maintenance,  trouble shooting, and change management.' by 31/10/2010. It is 
envisaged that this document will be authored by all concerned.

However as Steve Donegan and I undertook the preparation of an important (but 
out of the original  'revitalizing' project scope) document to finalize NERC 
Metadata Standard I've anticipated that this deliverable will be a little 
behind schedule as work is yet to start.  This delay has already be 
communicated to SIB.

Kay




--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.

_______________________________________________
NDG-technical mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.ncas.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ndg-technical



--
James Doughty
Director
Diass Limited
07985 443973
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
NDG-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ncas.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ndg-technical

Reply via email to