I'm sure the emc experts presenting material during the emc tracks at the UL NEBS symposium in Vegas this week could shed some light on this issue. See www.ul.com.
Randy Ivans Global Program Manager -Telecommunications Underwriters Laboratories Inc. 1285 Walt Whitman Rd. Melville, NY 11747 TEL: 631-271-6200; Ext. 22269 Department FAX: 631-439-6096 Direct FAX: 631-439-6131 email: randolph.j.iv...@us.ul.com n...@world.st d.com To: nebs@world.std.com cc: (bcc: Randolph J. Ivans/MEL/ULI) 09/27/00 Subject: Re: GR1089 Radiated Magnetic Field 10:56 AM limits Did you get any responses to your question? What part of the math didn't work out? On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:06:23 -0700, David Spencer <dspen...@oresis.com> wrote: >I am working out a test plan for the magnetic field requirements in GR1089 >3.2.2 and noticed that the math didn't work when I started figuring the >dBuA/m for a 10 meter site. This is kind of a duh question, but am I >correct in assuming that we need to do the H fields at 3 meters? If someone >wouldn't mind sharing the distances they use for this test, I would be most >grateful. >Thanks, >Dave Spencer Compliance Engineer >Oresis Communications, Inc. >14670 NW Greenbrier Parkway, Beaverton, OR 97006 >* dspen...@oresis.com * http://www.oresis.com >* (503) 466-6289 * (503) 533-8233 ********* Internet E-mail Confidentiality Disclaimer ********** This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, use, disseminate, distribute, copy or rely upon this message or attachment in any way. If you received this e-mail message in error, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify Underwriters Laboratories Inc. at e-mail_disclai...@us.ul.com. UL does not accept liability for any errors, omissions, corruption or virus in the contents of this message or any attachments that arise as a result of e-mail transmission. **************************************************************************
Headers.822
Description: Binary data