Hey Michael,
Don't forget why we are where we are...his name is Mr. Graff.  He created
the divergence of the shows because he didn't like the way UL was running
the program.  This will probably not change any time soon, much like the
requirement to have IR video and a flammability database.  The divergence is
going to continue with the RBOC's as well...I think in the next couple of
years you will see SBC switch over to ANSI based specifications, which is
something Larry Wong is leaning toward.  It is to difficult to get Telcordia
to re-examine outdated or misguided requirements, leading many test labs to
do their own thing (Altitude is a prime example).  I tend to look at it as
job security for the time being...

See ya in the halls,
Dave Spencer
Compliance Engineer
Oresis Communications, Inc.
14670 NW Greenbrier Parkway, Beaverton, OR  97006
(503)533-0717 Dir: (503)466-6289  Fax: (503)533-8233
http://www.oresis.com  dspen...@oresis.com


-----Original Message-----
From: michael.garret...@radisys.com
[mailto:michael.garret...@radisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:27 AM
To: nebs@world.std.com
Subject: Bipolar NEBS conferences



Group,

I wholeheartedly agree with Steve's comments and I know I'm not alone.  I'm
under the impression that most firms faced a choice this year - Baltimore
or Vegas.  For companies with compliance staffs large enough to split
coverage, sending different people to each was an option - typically more
expensive.  For smaller firms, this was not an option.  Even for those that
split attendence, you're pushing things further down the path of divergence
Steve highlighted in his message - one group of people get one set of
information, the other group gets another.  Beyond the participants, many
of the exhibitors faced the same choice - how do we staff two booths?

Working within the NEBS environment can be complicated enough with out this
further curve in the road.  Considering deltas for Verizon, AT&T, SBC,
ETSI, etc. to complete the passel of certifications and divergent
documentation needed to position telecom equipment for sale in the world
market today is challenging enough without setting things up for a he
said/she said situation by holding two separate conferences concurrently
(or two conferences at all!).

When I look at other industries and how they hold conferences, it amazes me
that we have come to this place.  The IEEE EMC Symposium brings virtually
everyone in that community together once a year for technical education and
exposure to the vendors in the field - labs, equipment vendors,
consultants, etc.  The SEMICON shows in the semiconductor industry have a
similar model with (much larger) regional shows held at different times
throughout the year.  In both of these cases, there is a consortium of
stakeholders who come together to put things on.

When contrasted with the model for the NEBS conference(s), you have one
firm (Verizon or UL) working with others in the area (joint sponsors) to
put something on.  It's typically not open to a wide variety of
participants.  The agenda is largely set by a small group of people who
have done it for some time.  From my standpoint, a significant segment
(equipment vendors) are underrepresented (or not represented at all) in the
planning and execution of the show.  And while the conferences in their
present form have been beneficial, my sense is that they fall well short of
the potential that could be achieved.

I feel it likely that both of these firms (Verizon and UL) feel losing
control of what they've developed by opening things up to a broader
consortium is not in their best interest - I hope that this is not the
case.  Even if they maintain their shows - which I hope is not the case - I
emplore them to work together to ensure they will be held on different
dates.

Beyond the conferences, there are other issues in this space that REQUIRE
that we, as an industry, get together and work things out.  The main issue
in this space is likely revisions to the standards, but I'm sure there are
others, as well.

I'm interested in hearing what others have to say on this - either on the
NEBS forum (thank you Mr. Curtis) or in e-mail to me directly.  Material
sent to me will not be shared with others unless implicit permission is
stated in the text of the message.

Regards,

Michael Garretson
Sr. Compliance Engineer
RadiSys Corporation
+1 503 615-1227

<end - Today's rant>



 

                    "Owen, Steve"

                    <Steve.Owen@COMPA        To:     "'nebs@world.std.com'"
<nebs@world.std.com>                       
                    Q.com>                   cc:     "Ramirez, Al
(CustomSystems)" <ramire...@compaq.com>, "Lyons,     
                    Sent by:                 Mike" <mike.ly...@compaq.com>

                    nebs-approval@wor        Subject:     RE: NEBS 2001
Announcement                                   
                    ld.std.com

 

 

                    11/01/2000 01:56

                    PM

                    Please respond to

                    nebs

 

 





While we appreciate the need for Verizon to get a head start on next year's
conference, we certainly hope they can find a way to work with UL and get
the NEBS conference(s) joined back into a single event.

Having two conferences, especially overlapping conferences as was the case
this year, puts extra strain on equipment manufacturers and others because
they have to send representatives to both conferences to make sure they
have
a complete understanding of all the issues.

One of the big topics this year (at both conferences I believe) was that of
divergence.  RBOCs are diverging from NEBS and diverging from each other.
This complicates things greatly for equipment manufacturers.  Having two
NEBS conferences only serves to accelerate this trend.

We urge Verizon, UL, and Telcordia to work together to bring us back to a
unified conference in 2001.

Regards,
Mike Lyons, Steve Owen, and Al Ramirez
Compaq Computer Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: Jon D. Curtis [mailto:j...@curtis-straus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 3:05 PM
To: nebs@world.std.com
Subject: NEBS 2001 Announcement


Posted for Chuck Graff.

November 1, 2000

RE: Verizon Communications NEBS Announcement

     In the fall of 2001, Verizon will be sponsoring our 7th annual NEBS

conference. The conference will be titled: "NEBS 2001 - Network
Challenges for
the 21st Century."  We are presently working on the dates and location.
Our new
format was well received this year, and we will continue to strive to
make
enhancements to the program. Since the Verizon Central Office (CO) tour
was such
a major success, in 2001 we are going to provide conference attendees
with a
virtual tour of a typical Verizon CO.

     In 2001, we are going to invite the Telecom industry to participate
more
fully in the conference.  A new feature to be added, will be a series of

innovative talks entitled  "The Vendors Corner". Multiple vendors will
be
invited to present their creative solutions on complex issues in
achieving NEBS
compliance.

     To facilitate this new session equipment manufacturers and test
labs are
invited to submit a paper (1 per company) to Verizon. The paper should
include
unique aspects of NEBS compliance that your Company has experienced.
This could
include historical perspectives (interesting planning and testing
stories) as
well as lessons learned and implemented in current planning efforts for
NEBS
compliance. Only those who are selected will be notified after the
papers are
submitted. The selected presenter(s) will be allotted 20 minutes during
NEBS
2001 to present their paper. All forms of media which are to be used
during the
presentation should be included as part of the submission.

     Rules for submission of papers:
     Initial Submission Date: January 15, 2001 (late papers will not be
accepted)
     Initial Submission Format: Word 7.0, Times New Roman, 12 Point.
     No confidential or proprietary information will be accepted.
     Notification Date: The selected presenters will be notified by
Email in
February 2001.
     Presentation Receipt Date: Final Presentation must be received by
Verizon
     no
                                                 later than June 1, 2001

     Final Submission Format: Power Point Ver 97 and any other media
agreed upon
     by Verizon, at time of first submission.
     All Submissions should be sent Email to: ludwig.c.gr...@verizon.com

We look forward to seeing you at "NEBS 2001 - Network Challenges for the
21st
Century".  The conference will be informative, educational, interactive,
and
most of all innovative. As more information becomes available, you will
be
notified.


Chuck Graff
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Verizon Communications



Reply via email to