Sounds like the CE + CE = CE? In my limited experience with the 1 product tested so far NOT in its normally installed rack, the lab did just that (generic Hendry).
Regards, Naftali Shani, Catena Networks (www.catena.com) 307 Legget Drive, Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2K 3C8 613.599.6430/866.2CATENA (X.8277); C 295.7042; F 599.0445 E-mail: nsh...@catena.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott Lemon [mailto:sle...@caspiannetworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:19 AM To: Nebs (E-mail) Subject: GR-63 Seismic Greetings Nebs group, I am interested in the general consensus with respect to one aspect of seismic testing of rack mounted equipment.... If a shelf-based system, which is designed to be installed in any seismic approved rack assembly (e.g. 19"), is seismic tested in a particular rack (e.g. Newton), is the performance normally extrapolated to be representative of installation in any generally "seismic approved" 19" rack (e.g. Hendry, tested by rack manuf with dummy loads, etc.)?? In other words, is GR-63 seismic compliance for the shelf system linked only to the rack in which it was tested, or will any generally tested GR-63 "seismic approved" rack suffice? Any and all opinions welcome. Thanks, Scott -- Regards, Scott Lemon CASPIAN NETWORKS sle...@caspiannetworks.com www.caspiannetworks.com
