Hi Don, The stability thing is not going to be a problem. The one breaking a build is going to pay a whole lot of beers to others for checking in code that breaks the builds.
So please let's stay with 2 builds like Nicolas. has requested minutes ago If you are not comfortable with this please let me know. Tom Am 22.10.10 23:39, schrieb Dunne, Donald G: > XViewer had a working Hudson build that got removed. Can we get that back or > have another one created. > > We have other builds and RCP apps that rely on the latest builds because the > code that is using the XViewer is being changed as features are needed. We > previously had it building successfully with a separate Hudson job every hour > which met our needs. We also can't rely on whether other Nebula widgets > succesfully build, which it sounds like will happen with an integrated build. > > I'm open to other options if there is something better. > > Don > > _______________________________________________ > nebula-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev -- B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tom schindl geschaeftsfuehrer/CEO ------------------------------------------------------------------------ eduard-bodem-gasse 5/1 A-6020 innsbruck phone ++43 512 935834 _______________________________________________ nebula-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
