>Hmm, not sure what you're saying here. Neko is not intended for >end-user programming primarily so comparing it to Ruby is apples vs >oranges. ;)
Sorry, I often throw haXe in with Neko... May bad. >It is well known that the current Ruby implementation has performance >problems. In general though, this makes no difference whatsoever to >many of its uses. For some folks, more performance is always good >though. I'd like to be able to stay in a single high-level lang as >much as possible and better Ruby perf would make that more viable for >a broader set of problems. Agreed. What language wouldn't benefit there? :-) Lee -- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
