>But the filesize is downloaded once then cached. Generating on the >server side is usualy more CPU and Bandwidth intensive.
That's true. >People dynamicly >generating SWF usualy don't know/want to learn ActionScript, which makes >sense, but I hope haXe fixes that point. Lol. But haXe is so similar to ActionScript that they're gonna learn it whatever route they take ;-) >But I agree there is some limited usages for dynamic SWF generation. Good :-) Would that sort of feature be difficult to do with haXe? Surely it's just a case of wiring up the GenSWF class and sending the result by stream? Lee -- Neko : One VM to run them all (http://nekovm.org)
