Ian Moores wrote:
> I would debate that Stephen, especially after interviewing lots of
> candidates who could talk .NET and related till the cows come home,
> but
> actually had not done any commercial .NET programming. The answer was
> not
> correct, as just saying _javascript_ does not demonstrate that the
> interviewee
> actually knows how to do it, just that he knows which technologies are
> capable of doing it, there is a difference, and i know which sort of
> programmer i would want working for me. You could answer questions
> like that
> all day long without ever actually having a clue how to code. In my
> experience i have seen people sit through technical interviews, come
> out
> with top marks, but then when asked to do a very simple bit of OO .NET
> programming , fail obismally.

Did the Q's I added at the bottom ever get read.  They demonstrate a general
knowledge of a doer instead of the MCSD test taker.

Asking someone pros/cons of this and that or why you wouldn't use something.


I have found to many Q's based on ASP coding styles and how to achieve the
same thing in ASP.NET.  When you get to the heart of the situation they
never learned ASP.NET, and just did a force into .NET for a compile.  IMO

Anyway sometime this week I'll try to get a skeleton of Q's that a C#
programmer should know, a trick Q for the liar to trip up on.  

Stephen Russell
S.R. & Associates
Memphis, TN 38115

901.246-0159


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here
Web Bug from http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=315388.5497957.6576270.3001176/D=groups/S=:HM/A=2372354/rand=598156767


Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to