Federal Manager's Daily Report: Monday, November 29, 2004

FEDweek is the largest information resource in the federal
government with now over one million weekly readers.
To Subscribe, Go to http://www.fedweek.com/subscribepopup.htm
***********************************************************
Valued Added Service to Our Readers:

Federal Job Search
http://www.fedweek.com/Jobs/default.asp   

Job Bulletin Board
http://www.fedweek.com/Jobs/default.asp      

Unlimited Internet Access for as low as $10.90
http://fedweeknet.com 

Our Readers Will Get Special Discounted Travel Rates
Including, Airfare, Hotels, RV's, Car Rentals, and 
Special Weekend Getaways--Anywhere in the world 
http://www.fedweek.com/images/adart/travel_redirect.htm 
**********************************************************
In This Week's Issue
1. Union Official Calls Advisory Council Proposal 'Absurd'
2. GAO: Stronger Management Needed For FAA's Designee Programs 
3. More Battles Ahead on Contracting
***********************************************************

1. Union Official Calls Advisory Council Proposal 'Absurd'
A union official compared a federal advisory council proposal 
to install surveillance cameras in government vehicles to 
ensure that employees are buckling up, to the MTV television 
series "Pimp My Ride," in which contestants have their cars 
outfitted in tacky extravagance, saying the idea "redefines 
the word absurd." 

"At the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a 
spending freeze has left officers in the lurch when trying 
to fill the tanks of their official vehicles, as their 
government gas cards were declined for lack of payment. But 
we've got millions for high-tech gadgets? I'm sure the 
American taxpayer will be greatly amused," said Mark Roth, 
general counsel for the American Federation of Government 
Employees.

2. GAO: Stronger Management Needed For FAA's Designee 
Programs 
The Federal Aviation Administration needs to more consistently 
oversee and apply program policies to the thousands of 
"designees" it uses for safety certifications, the Government 
Accountability Office has said. 

It said the "technically qualified individuals and organizations" 
perform 90 percent of its certification activities, something 
that frees up resources for more critical safety functions 
such certifying complex aircraft designs. 

However, according to GAO-05-40, "inconsistent FAA oversight 
and application of program policies are key weaknesses of the 
designee programs."

The report said headquarters has only evaluated six of the18 
designee programs in seven years, and that the agency carried 
them out ad hoc and lacks criteria for ongoing evaluations. 

An internal FAA study found that field offices sometimes fail 
to oversee designee activities according to agency policy, 
and that inspectors were not annually reviewing pilot examiner 
work as required by program policy, said GAO. 

It cited as potential reasons for inconsistent oversight: 
incomplete databases that FAA uses to manage its oversight 
of designees; workload demands for FAA staff that limit the 
time spent on designee oversight; and, the lack of adequate 
training for FAA staff who oversee designees.

3. More Battles Ahead on Contracting
Action on a wrapup spending bill for the current fiscal year 
left several issues involving federal contracting-out policy 
unresolved and likely to surface again in the new Congress 
convening in January.

In crafting the bill, House and Senate negotiators dropped 
language that had been passed by the full House and by the 
Senate Appropriations Committee that would have effectively 
killed the Bush administration's 2003 revisions to Office of 
Management and Budget Circular A-76. The action came after 
repeated statements of opposition from the White House, 
including a veto threat.

In a similar situation last year, a compromise was reached 
in which those restrictions were applied only to agencies 
covered by the bill that serves as the vehicle for the 
language, the Transportation-Treasury bill. However, this 
year, the White House succeeded in getting the language 
dropped entirely. (A House provision that would have barred 
the IRS from contracting for debt collection services also 
was dropped.)

Backers of the restrictive language--prominently, federal 
unions and certain members of Congress active in civil 
service issues--say they will try again. They point to the 
full House vote as evidence of bipartisan support for 
blocking at least some of the provisions of the 2003 change. 
In particular, they intend to target the new policy that 
decisions can be made on the basis of quality and other 
non-cost factors, instead favoring language requiring that 
studies must show savings of at least 10 percent or $10 
million before work can be converted to contract. 

They also note that they succeeded in enacting this year 
similar restrictions at the Defense Department, which has 
about two-thirds of the jobs scheduled for contracting 
comparisons. In addition, as part of a defense bill, a 
government-wide provision was enacted that grants the 
in-house side a right to appeal contracting decisions to 
the Government Accountability Office, although management 
officials--not employees or unions--would have to file the 
appeals.


FEDweek
Publisher, Don Mace
VP of Marketing, Kevin Couch
Website: http://www.fedweek.com 
11541 Nuckols Rd. Suite D
Glen Allen, VA 23059
(804) 288-5321




[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
You are subscribed to federalmanagersdailyreport as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to