Thanks Michael. The RETURN 1 approach has been working correctly for me and prevents needing to do a COUNT(*).
> Afaik there are no plans for providing expected results (esp, as those can > grow gigantic). > Yes of course :) As mentioned, I am *only* using this approach for write operations where no results are being returned. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
