The merge is not done by hand so the rel name will be consistent every time. I'm going to see if I can reproduce it.
A little more information: Initially, that start node had two relationships A-[produces]->B A-[produces]->C The problem showed up after detach-deleting C after which we had: A-[produces]->B A-[produces]->B I'll see if this pops up again in the next few days. -Eric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
