Hi Nigel, I'm not sure but what I've seen is that there is a neo4j.Session thread that it's trying to do a 'begin' on a session worker that is already IN_TRANSACTION. How can I know who is doing that operation that is triggering that thread and why it's trying to begin an already started session worker?
El jueves, 4 de agosto de 2016, 18:49:42 (UTC-3), Nigel Small escribió: > > Hi Matias > > It's hard to tell without seeing some code. What concurrency are you > referring to? > > I do think we need to fix that error though - it's very unhelpful to a > typical application developer. Coincidentally, we're currently working on > this part of the code so I'll make sure we improve the error message! > > Nigel > > On 3 August 2016 at 20:03, Matias Burak <mbu...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Hi, anyone knows why I am getting this error? >> >> >> 'beginning implicit transaction' cannot be done when a session is in the >> 'IN_TRANSACTION' state. >> >> >> This is using java-driver v1.0.4 and bolt 3.0.4 >> >> >> It looks that this is happening when the driver is doing a hasNext. >> >> Is that starting an implicit transaction? >> >> I think it might have to do with concurrent bolt calls to do certain >> operations? It's weird.... >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Neo4j" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to neo4j+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Neo4j" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neo4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
