On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 09:00:40AM +0200, Henrik Holst wrote: > Thanks Joe, > > the reason that I put it into ne_ssl_context_trustcert() was that it > was the real place where the pointer would be dereferenced and since there > also could be (in the future) other callers than ne_ssl_trust_cert() my > reasoning where that it would be better to protect all callers than to put > the protection higher up. Following this reason we should add the check to > the GnuTLS code aswell, but this is of course a matter of taste.
Ah, right. In general there is no need to check where NULL is inappropriately passed to a function in place of a valid object; see the "Argument validation" section in the reference docs. joe _______________________________________________ neon mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.webdav.org/mailman/listinfo/neon
