Yea, 4 digits, not that interesting and popular. 6 digits is much much better. What would be the final price range you are thinking about? By the way, do you have a prototype yet? Id like to see pictures and/or video.
On Wednesday, 13 March 2013 18:33:37 UTC, Michail wrote: > > I think I buy just about every clock made (6 digit). > > Maybe consider the 6 as well since a 4 digit isn't for me? Guess it also, > in a way, depends on price. > > Michail > > In a message dated 3/13/2013 11:23:50 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > dbhel...@gmail.com <javascript:> writes: > > Assuming I can determine it's feasible at all, my plan is to do a > Kickstarter campaign; I am tentatively imagining somewhere in the > neighborhood of 200-300 clocks, so with 4 digits each that'd be 800-1200 > tubes. If the Kickstarter campaign were to really catch fire (hey, never > hurts to dream), it could be a lot more, so one of the things I am trying > to find out is what the effective maximum number available are. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/neonixie-l/-/bS8U92NOEVAJ. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
