You mean using the milis function instead of a RTC? Anyway, this looks like a good basis to me, I'm only missing the part that actually sets the time (I believe).
Op donderdag 21 november 2013 23:09:49 UTC+1 schreef nixiebunny: > > On 11/21/2013 3:03 PM, Gideon Wackers wrote: > > I will > > also add a RTC because for what they cost it seems like they make things > a > > lot easier. > > > > I have always thought it strange when people do that. After all, the job > of a > microcontroller that runs a clock is to keep track of the time and make it > show > up on the display. Why add a second chip to keep track of the time when > the > micro is perfectly capable of doing that job? > > Especially if someone has already written the code for you, unless they > did a > bad job of it. > -- > David Forbes, Tucson, AZ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/548b31ed-5118-42e9-9fdb-0a73dc0e3d8b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
