On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 15:17:28 UTC+1, Grahame Marsh wrote: > > I read it that Pete has two problems and I have one of them - poor > triggering in the dark which we understand and have fixes for based on UV > from LEDs (a semiconductor solution) or a pond UV lamp (i.e a "valve" > solution). But Pete has a second problem that I do not see which is > misfiring under lit conditions. Pete has issues with his construction > density perhaps; mine is not very small. I'm at a loss to suggest > anything; Pete seems to have a triggering sensistivity on the rings far > higher than mine and the only substantive component change is that Pete has > changed one of the cathode resistors and I change the common anode resistor > to account for a higher supply voltage. Our source of XC18s was the same. > > I have the XC18 rings running with 180V (Dance) and I have a Z700U ring > running as well (this runs in complete darkness as each has a primer > electrode) :D >
Indeed - we all seem to be using the same source of XC-18s (why is he the only person with them in bulk?) - I have a box of Z700Us, so will give those a go as well - MTX-90s are also an option - they look a promising alternative too... Nick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/c5185173-83bf-41bd-af3d-8d54d395631d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
