Wow, Martin!  Your memory is much better than mine ;)  I just had another 
look through my old files and the patents were in my Nixie folder, not the 
Dekatron one.  I have uploaded a small collection to my DropBox:  
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gtxboyvkna7j8dt/6167%20Docs.zip?dl=0

Yours,
Mike

On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 2:52:12 PM UTC-5 Dekatron42 wrote:

> There's another nice datasheet with a lot of information here: 
> https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f0983034219c6086e8100ac/t/5f4566168ede3e5edceb395e/1598383652854/439A.pdf
>
> @mjrippe: If my mind doesn't play tricks on me I think I got some 
> Telephone related patents from you after you mentioned them in this thread 
> where I asked for help to get my 6167/WE439A to run: 
> https://groups.google.com/g/neonixie-l/c/xn7QcomQZSg
>
> /Martin
>
> On Friday, 25 February 2022 at 18:08:14 UTC+1 mjrippe wrote:
>
>> >I wish we knew which device used W.E. 6167 dekatrons so that we could 
>> have a look at the diagram...
>>
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> I did some research on these tubes about a decade ago.  There was not 
>> much info available, perhaps more to be found now.  Here is the one use 
>> case I did find - good luck finding out more!
>>
>> From AAFM Vol. 6, No. 1  March, 1998  (Association of Air Force 
>> Missileers)
>>
>> Origin of the Ground Guidance System The Titan I
>> guidance system was developed by Bell Telephone Laboratories
>> (BTL). It started as a WW II shipboard radar,
>> built by Western Electric Company, and grew to include
>> an analog guidance computer for guiding early experimental
>> rockets and the Nike-series missiles. The analog
>> computer used two large motor-driven oil-filled sinecosine
>> potentiometers and lots of op amps to generate
>> the guidance equation. A bank of ten turn
>> potentiometers provided variables to the guidance
>> equation, so that roll-over and changes in acceleration
>> could be programmed. The whole thing was sequenced
>> by some little Western Electric 6167 ten-step pixie tubes.
>> It used electron tubes, for this was before the proliferation
>> of the transistor, and mean time between failures was
>> acceptable for that era, but short.
>>
>>
>> Yours,
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thursday, February 24, 2022 at 6:58:00 AM UTC-5 Paolo Cravero wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 11:04 PM Jon <deka...@nomotron.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks to Martin, Eric and Jon for their answers.
>>>
>>> However, if I understand Paolo's post, he's using Mike Moorrees's 
>>>> circuit (https://threeneurons.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/we6167ckt.gif) 
>>>> which leaves the auxiliary anode disconnected. When I ran 6167s in this 
>>>> configuration they were generally much more reliable in not sticking on 
>>>> K10, though I was using rather different circuit conditions:
>>>>
>>>>    - Va = +400V with respect to main cathodes
>>>>    - Transfer pulses 60V amplitude from a resting bias +30V with 
>>>>    respect to main cathodes
>>>>    - Anode current 1.3mA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paolo, can you confirm you have indeed left pin 5 unconnected? 
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I confirm I used that circuit from A to Z. Then I varied the bias 
>>> voltage and/or anode current (up to 1.5 mA), but both auxiliary anode and 
>>> reset were floating. 
>>>
>>> I will rebuild the test setup with an external power supply that can 
>>> provide more current, as the LM393 booster is struggling with 2 mA at 400+ 
>>> V, and use zeners to derive the bias. According to Jon's list, a starting 
>>> point for voltages should be:
>>>
>>>    - main cathodes +30V,
>>>    - transfer pulses from +60V to 0V,
>>>    - main anode at +430V;
>>>    - K10 current at 2mA which brings
>>>    - auxiliary anode at +115V (datasheet PDF, 4th page)
>>>    
>>> I wish we knew which device used W.E. 6167 dekatrons so that we could 
>>> have a look at the diagram...
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/3fb123b4-fa8b-4dd0-8496-570bea81a68bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to