I've used a MAX1771 with ceramic capacitors a while ago for a 
pandicon-circuit and a smaller nixie project. Both consume less than 
15mA@170V. Not sure how the circuit would behave at more current. 

On Thursday, 19 May 2022 at 20:03:18 UTC+2 Dekatron42 wrote:

> A few other things that I experienced at my previous employer was that 
> larger (sizewise) MLCC capacitors easily developed cracks, came loose from 
> the circuit board and also needed reforming after storage.
>
> /Martin
>
> On Thursday, 19 May 2022 at 05:01:25 UTC+2 mo...@neonixie.com wrote:
>
>> Roger,
>>
>> Yes. Looks like the common dielectrics (X7T, X7R) available in the 250v 
>> 1-3uf range suffer from a 30-80% reduction in capacitance at 180v. I hadn't 
>> realized it was that high.
>> Thank you, I'll look at the polymer caps. It's my last remaining 
>> electrolytic on my board and if possible I would like to use a solid one 
>> instead.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -Moses
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 18, 2022 at 7:54:10 PM UTC-7 Roger Brinkman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Moses,
>>>
>>> What David writes below about the capacitance reduction of ceramic 
>>> capacitors is correct. 
>>> I have experienced success using polymer aluminium electrolytics (solid 
>>> electrolyte) to replace conventional low-ESR electrolytic capacitors that 
>>> regularly fail in similar applications. 
>>> You might like to experiment with these. 
>>>
>>> Best regards 
>>> Roger Brinkman. 
>>>
>>> On 19 May 2022, at 12:42 pm, David Forbes <nixie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> I haven't tried it, but I can make some observations. The MAX1771 isn't 
>>> connected directly to the output circuit, so it's not likely to suffer from 
>>> a problem. The current flows through the inductor which will accommodate a 
>>> momentary short circuit caused by the capacitor. 
>>> In short, it shouldn't be a problem.
>>> Bear in mind that the effective capacitance of a modern ceramic 
>>> capacitor is much lower with a DC bias near its rated voltage, so you would 
>>> need to use either capacitors rated for 5x the output voltage, or about 5x 
>>> the desired capacitance.
>>> Some capacitor data sheets publish this reduction in capacitance as a 
>>> function of bias voltage, most don't. Look for it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 18, 2022, 6:49 PM Moses <mo...@neonixie.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Before I let the magic smoke out of half a dozen MAX1771 ICs.. has 
>>>> anyone ever tried using ceramic output capacitors? It wants a low ESR 
>>>> capacitor, so ceramics may work well.
>>>>
>>>> The datasheet doesn't mention ceramics on the output side.. but then 
>>>> again it was written a few decades ago when the required 
>>>> voltage/capacitance probably was not readily available.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> -Moses
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7ae38dca-64ca-459d-a1e5-283a062f8f9en%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7ae38dca-64ca-459d-a1e5-283a062f8f9en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAPbqtvcg0ak%2BLMH_7JJ01eFnYjFzu38v2N59k8ZfoFxrRY3J_g%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/CAPbqtvcg0ak%2BLMH_7JJ01eFnYjFzu38v2N59k8ZfoFxrRY3J_g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/bb141fcc-15ab-45de-a7ae-c9b38a3710dbn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to