I do not have any plans in that direction. So far I thought creating them on build-time is a better approach. Why do you think it would be better in a lib?
Cheers, Sebastian PierreL wrote: > Thanks, > > Will pimo.h or nie.h or nfo.h be included in kdebase/kdelibs some time soon? > If not, are there any plans to do so in the future? > > ~Pierre > > > > --- On Fri, 29/1/10, Sebastian Trueg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Sebastian Trueg <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk::Vocabulary ???? >> To: "PierreL" <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] >> Date: Friday, 29 January, 2010, 14:16 >> You generate those files from the >> ontologies. Have a look at [1] for >> documentation and [2] for examples. >> >> Cheers, >> Sebastian >> >> [1] >> http://soprano.sourceforge.net/apidox/trunk/soprano_howto.html#cmake_magic >> [2] >> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/base/nepomuk-kde/nepomukutils/CMakeLists.txt?view=markup >> >> PierreL wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On KDE 4.3.4. Distro is not Mandriva. Trying to use >> Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO >>> How and from where would I get the pimo.h file? How >> would I install this? Where can I find the documentation on >> this? When will this be included in KDE? >>> Thanks, >>> Pierre >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nepomuk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
