-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104029/#review11001
-----------------------------------------------------------


This review has been submitted with commit 
2afa97bdf38982180f4a8fa15507f62b75173c58 by Vishesh Handa to branch KDE/4.8.

- Commit Hook


On Feb. 20, 2012, 2:32 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104029/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 20, 2012, 2:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There is no point in updating the cache, if the cache hasn't been created.
> 
> In a lot of places (eg - queryservice ) Nepomuk::Resource::uri() is used, 
> which lands up calling determineUri and would then send a dbus call for the 
> resource to get added to the ResourceWatcher. We don't want that additional 
> overhead.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/resourcedata.cpp 434a6a5 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104029/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to