On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:53 AM, David Narvaez <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi, > > I have tried to follow the thread about the Nepomuk situation but > can't figure out answers to these questions now that I'm working on > Activities and Nepomuk to fix the Icons/Ontologies tragedy: > > 1) When will Nepomuk Core replace kde-runtime's Nepomuk services and > stuff? KDE 4.9? > Yup. That's the plan. > 2) Nepomuk Core seems to depend on Soprano's latest Git version which > includes the commit 3206bae6 that adds DefiningProperty, and this > doesn't seem to be lined up to Soprano 2.7, judging by the 2.7 branch. > Will Nepomuk Core depend on next Soprano release? > Yes. Sebastian should release the next version of Soprano. It contains a lot of important fixes. > 3) It looks like Nepomuk Core is not API compatible with kde-runtime's > Nepomuk, e.g. it is missing setSymbols and maybe other methods. This > affects Activities Library, so my question is if Activities Library's > master should be patched to work with Nepomuk Core for KDE 4.9 or the > other way around. > I think setSymbols should be added to nepomuk-core. A lot of people use it, and there is no replacement. I cannot remember the exact reason we'd removed setSymbols. I do however remember having to patch it up for KDE 4.8. To answer your question - both. > Thanks. > > David E. Narváez > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
