> On June 15, 2012, 2:50 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> > I think this is correct. But I cannot remember exactly why I introduced the 
> > thread in the first place. So I am not entirely sure. But if you tested 
> > everything including automatic query updates then this should be fine.
> > Actually I suppose we could improve the performance even more by not using 
> > the query service...
> 
> Vishesh Handa wrote:
>     I'll test it more. I've checked out the BlueDevil code, and they do it in 
> the pretty much same way.
>     
>     Even I wanted to not use the QueryService, but we need query updates. 
> Maybe we could abstract away the query service stuff and just do it in the 
> query service?

Well, the query updates are done in the kded module anyway. The kio slave is 
not concerend with that.


- Sebastian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105255/#review14761
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 14, 2012, 11:28 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105255/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 14, 2012, 11:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The extra QThread isn't really required and complicates the code, and also 
> adds an unnecessary overhead.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   nepomuk/kioslaves/search/kio_nepomuksearch.h e68ff29 
>   nepomuk/kioslaves/search/kio_nepomuksearch.cpp 38894be 
>   nepomuk/kioslaves/search/searchfolder.h c0839b5 
>   nepomuk/kioslaves/search/searchfolder.cpp 8088c46 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105255/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Works exactly the same as before.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to