> On July 18, 2011, 11:23 a.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote: > > Good catch. However, I would prefer to use the licensing header provided by > > KDE: http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy#LGPL_Header > > Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: > Do you want me to prepare a new diff ?
Ping? - Vishesh ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101972/#review4807 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 16, 2011, 7:56 p.m., Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101972/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 16, 2011, 7:56 p.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk. > > > Description > ------- > > Krazy in EBN reports that several files in kdelibs/nepmuk ar GPL'ed instead > of LGPL'ed. This patch fix it. > Remark: Although I can create a review request, I can't ship it - only > Sebastian Trueg can. > > > Diffs > ----- > > nepomuk/utils/daterange.h 0d793d5 > nepomuk/utils/daterange.cpp cbb3b28 > nepomuk/utils/daterangeselectionwidget.h 16a6dfb > nepomuk/utils/daterangeselectionwidget.cpp a3c4979 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101972/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Krazy do not report an error anymore. > > > Thanks, > > Artem Serebriyskiy > >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
