> On July 25, 2012, 7:06 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote: > > OK then, ship it. Strigi needs some serious fixing or replacement I fear.
I have plans to replace it. Give me some time. - Vishesh ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105730/#review16414 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 25, 2012, 2:59 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105730/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 25, 2012, 2:59 p.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg. > > > Description > ------- > > If the strigi indexer fails to index the file, we index it with this new > "simple indexer" which just sets the basic properties like url, > filename and the mimetype. > > This way, file which weren't indexed, will at least still appear in some > of the search results. > > The nie:lastModifed for these files has not been set, so the > indexscheduler will still find these files, and try to index them again. > > > Diffs > ----- > > services/fileindexer/indexer/CMakeLists.txt 1a5a506 > services/fileindexer/indexer/main.cpp e3c7288 > services/fileindexer/indexer/simpleindexer.h PRE-CREATION > services/fileindexer/indexer/simpleindexer.cpp PRE-CREATION > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105730/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Manually tested > > > Thanks, > > Vishesh Handa > >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
