-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105755/#review16568
-----------------------------------------------------------


I have just been informed that the tarballs for nepomuk-core have already been 
spun. Could we please please re-spin them, and include this patch. I don't care 
about the rest. They are just bug fixes.

This one removes an entire class, and if KDE 4.9, goes out without this patch, 
I can never remove it. Not until Frameworks.

- Vishesh Handa


On July 27, 2012, 2:37 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105755/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 27, 2012, 2:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk, Release Team and Sebastian Trueg.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> No one uses it, and the same class can be generated using the rcgen. 
> I don't see the point of having this class.
> 
> This is my last chance to remove this old code. Otherwise I'll have to wait 
> till KDE Frameworks 5.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   includes/CMakeLists.txt 4ac2d7c 
>   includes/Thing 952544e 
>   libnepomukcore/CMakeLists.txt 066c898 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/thing.h 2ae3d75 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/thing.cpp 59f2a4d 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105755/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to