----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105766/#review16722 -----------------------------------------------------------
Spoke with Vishesh and Patrick, this patch is correct but does not need 4.9.0 tarballs respinning. - Albert Astals Cid On July 28, 2012, 12:09 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105766/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 28, 2012, 12:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for Nepomuk, Release Team, Patrick Spendrin, and Sebastian > Trueg. > > > Description > ------- > > Do no depend on kdelibs Nepomuk > > * Removed find_package(Nepomuk REQUIRED), and other unnecessary commands > * We do not need to include NEPOMUK_INCLUDE_DIR in the list of includes > > @Release-Team: Apparently needed for Windows. > > > Diffs > ----- > > server/CMakeLists.txt 9635f22 > services/backupsync/gui/CMakeLists.txt 02800d3 > services/backupsync/gui/guitest/CMakeLists.txt 146ba3a > services/backupsync/lib/CMakeLists.txt 769a116 > services/backupsync/lib/test/CMakeLists.txt 55d0af7 > services/backupsync/service/CMakeLists.txt 6fa785c > services/fileindexer/CMakeLists.txt 60d9b36 > services/fileindexer/indexer/CMakeLists.txt 38b46c8 > services/fileindexer/test/CMakeLists.txt 4e66e7b > services/filewatch/CMakeLists.txt fd5d710 > services/storage/test/CMakeLists.txt cbef45e > servicestub/CMakeLists.txt 88b24aa > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105766/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Vishesh Handa > >
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
