Hey Todd On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:20 PM, todd rme <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am trying to confirm the proper license for nepomuk-core. It > appears it is mostly LGPL licensed, but some files are under the GPL > license. This would make the package as a whole GPL licensed as I > understand it. Is this correct? > Well, before 4.9, the nepomuk code was present in kdelibs (lgpl) and kde-runtime (gpl). The kdelibs part were the APIs. Now that we have combined them, we have the current situation. I would like the package to be marked as LGPL, since users of Nepomuk (developers) should not have to care about the runtime components. For them, the library is all that matters, which is LGPL. > Todd > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > -- Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
