On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:36 AM, Simeon Bird <[email protected]> wrote:

> The reason the test is failing is that it runs in release mode and we
> have in genericdatamanagementjob_p.h:
>
> #ifndef NDEBUG
> #define DMS_DBUS_SERVICE
> (qgetenv("NEPOMUK_FAKE_DMS_DBUS_SERVICE").isEmpty() ?
> "org.kde.nepomuk.DataManagement" :
> qgetenv("NEPOMUK_FAKE_DMS_DBUS_SERVICE").constData())
> #else
> #define DMS_DBUS_SERVICE "org.kde.nepomuk.DataManagement"
> #endif
>
> so it only pays attention to the fake data management service in debug
> mode.
>
> I'm not sure how to fix this...getenv is probably too expensive in
> release mode, right?
>

Well, it is a test. How does it matter if it is expensive?


>
> Simeon
>
>
> On 11 March 2013 14:31, Vishesh Handa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > To mailing list people
> >
> > I know these emails might be a tad bit annoying, but they will only be
> sent
> > if some test is failing or if nepomuk is not building. Currently 3 tests
> are
> > failing. Until they are fixed, we will probably get an email each time
> > someone pushes something to the stable branch.
> >
> > It would be awesome if someone could fix the tests! :D
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:58 PM, KDE CI System <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> See <http://build.kde.org/job/nepomuk-core_stable/changes>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Nepomuk mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vishesh Handa
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> >
>



-- 
Vishesh Handa
_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to