Hi, I vote 2) - it keeps the dependency chain short. Also 1) requires skilled labour, which is in short supply, while 2) could get us some contributors, as Vishesh says, which is totally worth it.
Simeon On 19 March 2013 14:24, Jörg Ehrichs <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > i would prefer option , while it is very easy to write the indexers > this means only > unnecessary code duplication. Also (if I remember right) the Okular > guys wanted to > have their libs clean anyway and remove the gui dependencies there (kdialaog > for > password protected stuff and so on). > > Can't we make a GSoC out of it together with the Okular team? > > Otherwise they maybe faster solution and the one that could give > results for 4.11 > would be option 2, also if okular needs 3rd party libs for their parsing too > the > code duplication issue might not be as big? > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
