On Wednesday 11 Dec 2013 11:37:45 Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > Vishesh Handa wrote: > >> On Wednesday 11 Dec 2013 10:04:14 Rex Dieter wrote: > >>> I see a new virtuoso opensource 6.1.8 release landed, anyone have a > >>> chance to try it out to see how well/safe it is wrt nepomuk? > >> > >> I haven't tested it so far. I can do that this week. > >> > >> The usual thing I do is to run the nepomuk-core unit tests before and > >> after. They are a good indicator. > > > > OK, I'll do that now, and post results. > > Cliff's notes edition, running 'make check' from nepomuk-core-4.11.3: > > Against virtuoso opensource 6.1.6: > > 90% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 20 > > Total Test time (real) = 926.24 sec > > The following tests FAILED: > 2 - datamanagementmodeltest (Failed) > 11 - NepomukResourceTest (Failed) >
Strange. All tests seem to pass for me. Testing Nepomuk is fairly complex, and maybe the testing framework isn't being setup properly. I'll try it out. > > Against virtuoso opensource 6.1.8: > > 95% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 20 > > Total Test time (real) = 893.35 sec > > The following tests FAILED: > 5 - identificationtest (Failed) > > > > Detailed output here: > http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/nepomuk-core/ > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk -- Vishesh Handa _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
