--On Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:48 PM +0100 Pavel Kankovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Mike Batchelor wrote: > >> I have a host at 209.104.33.252 which Nessus (1.0.7a) claims responds to >> ICMP_MASQREQ. > ... >> Can someone confirm to me whether 209.104.33.252 responds to a >> ICMP_MASQREQ unicast? I do not know how to generate such a packet to >> test it myself. > > Try: nasl -t 209.104.33.252 /usr/lib/nessus/plugins/icmp_mask_req.nasl Ah, thanks. I am somewhat of a Nessus newbie and hadn't realized yet that I could do that. > And yes, your host responds to ICMP_MASKREQ...it's a wierd response > (zero mask?) but it is a response: > > 22:44:07.848911 myhost > lax1utlns2.tmcs.net: icmp: address mask request > 22:44:08.092817 lax1utlns2.tmcs.net > myhost: icmp: address mask is > 0x00000000 (DF) [tos 0x20] That's odd, but at least it has the requisite lack of utility that not answering also possesses. :) > > --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms > ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for > assimilation." > --- "The avalanche has already begun. It is too late for the pebbles to vote." -- Kosh
