On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:56:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are trying to find any information on what might cause Nessus to report 
> this finding. 
> We used Redhat 7.2 with Nessus 1.10 to run the scans. On the majority of 

Probably a false positive. It was fixed in Nessus 1.2.x



                                -- Renaud

Reply via email to