Pretty sure we'd like this save as PGP... option within nessus...or at
least
a convenient entry point to handle the output fiel within nessus
scripts.

On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 22:06, Darren Young wrote:
> Yea, opinions are like .... well, you know. Everyone has one. I think you're
> right, at least for my application, OpenBSD would be my preferred choice.
> I've done headless Linux machines, never tried that on OpenBSD. I've been
> using the Windows client so I can store the session data into a MySQL
> database until I can find a way to have the client do it. I think I'd rather
> just have the data off the public machine completely and PGP the reports
> when they are sent out.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: twig les [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:58 PM
> > To: Bezalel, Yaakov; Darren Young
> > Cc: Nessus Nessus Mailing List
> > Subject: RE: Nessus Location
> >
> >
> > I hesitate to write this cause I *really* don't want
> > to start a religous war...but in my experience if you
> > want it critically secured, build a headless OpenBSD
> > box that only listens for ssh (and, hence, sftp).
> > Patch every 3 months or whenever OpenSSH gets hacked
> > again, problem solved for the most part...
> >
> >
> > --- "Bezalel, Yaakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Darren,
> > >
> > > Suse has the encrypted file system, you could store
> > > output on such a
> > > file system
> > > (haven't tried it...).
> > > You could pgp it...don't know if nessus has a place
> > > you could intefere
> > > in the report file
> > > creation process.
> > >
> > > Jack.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 21:00, Darren Young wrote:
> > >
> > > That's kind of what I thought. Are there any
> > > protections outside normal
> > >
> > > system hardening I should take on the public
> > > scanning machine? I was
> > >
> > > planning on Linux, probably RedHat 7.x, for this
> > > host. I guess TCP
> > > wrappers
> > >
> > > around nessusd would be out of the question. Is
> > > there any way to operate
> > > the
> > >
> > > scanner on a 'stealth' interface? It probably won't
> > > work as well.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'd hate to do scans for someone that have the
> > > resulting data being
> > >
> > > compromised. Perhaps the results should be stored on
> > > an internal /
> > > protected
> > >
> > > machine?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Hugo van der Kooij
> > >
> > > > Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 12:50 PM
> > >
> > > > To: Nessus Nessus Mailing List
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: Nessus Location
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Darren Young wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > > Where is the "best" logical/physical position
> > > for a Nessus
> > >
> > > > scanning machine?
> > >
> > > > > In front of, behind or beside (DMZ) the
> > > firewall? When it's behind
> > > the
> > >
> > > > > firewall it generates quite a bit of noise with
> > > default
> > >
> > > > "passthrough" DENY
> > >
> > > > > and LOG rules. That's fine, I just want to be
> > > sure the firewall
> > > isn't
> > >
> > > > > dropping something that the scanner needs.
> > > Perhaps in a DMZ
> > >
> > > > with an "allow
> > >
> > > > > everything out and established"?
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Anything filtering in it's path will distort your
> > > measument and
> > >
> > > > invalidate
> > >
> > > > your findings.
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > IMO the only allowed place would be outside your
> > > firewall if you want
> > > to
> > >
> > > > perform tests outside your own network.
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > Hugo.
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > > > All email send to me is bound to the rules
> > > described on my homepage.
> > >
> > > >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
> > >
> > > >             Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
> > >
> > > >             for they are subtle and quick to anger.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > Only fools have all the answers.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

Reply via email to