On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:39:18PM -0400, Renaud Deraison wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 05:46:57PM +0200, Pavel Kankovsky wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > > What about multihomed or multiple ip-aliased machines? I would also > > > wish to have the possibility to choose another (valid!) Source IP. I > > > could do that with NATing the Source IP in the IP headers, but some > > > protocols contain the Source IP also in the payload (ftp, NetBIOS > > > etc.). > > > > I'd like to have such a feature too. In fact, I might try adding it > > in the near future. :) > > You'd just need to bind to the relevant IP addr. I don't think the > change would be too hard. > > Then the next step would be to cycle thru all the IP addresses I guess > (ie: if you have a eth0:0, eth0:1, eth0:2, eth0:3, ... eth0:N, have the > plugins use all the interfaces).
Are there benefits in using multiple source addresses? Would it be possible to make the set of available interfaces/aliases limited by user input? > Sounds fun - I'll work on it this week-end. Thanks! :) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
