I have a Windows NT 4.0 machine that is reporting false positives for this test and 
for ms03-026. 

This machine did have the 823980 patch on it this morning, I then took that off and 
ended up reinstalling the entire machine to make it work again (thanks MS). I scanned 
it with neither patch applied and msrpc_dcom2.nasl reports that both are missing 
(correctly). I then applied the latest patch since 823980 is not on the Windows Update 
list any more. It now reports that both ms03-026 and ms03-039 are not applied even 
though ms03-039 is. I ran the test plugin against it and it reports

error1=0000000000
error2=0000000000
error3=0200000000
error4=2000000003
Success

msrpc_dcom.nasl also fires and reports this machine as vulnerable with the ms03-039 
patch on.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Kapp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 13:11
To: Renaud Deraison; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MS RPC Patch (Mis-)Reporting


> Could you run the attached plugin in command-line mode and tell me
> what it outputs ? (nasl -t target msrpc_dcom2.nasl).

In the output below, test.nasl is the plugin that you sent in your e-mail.  
msrpc_dcom2.nasl is the production plugin.

bluepill:/lib/nessus/plugins# nasl -t 10.129.53.61 test.nasl
error1=5401048000
error2=0240008000
error3=0200000000
error4=2000000003
[19417] plug_set_key:send(0)['1 SMB/KB824146=1;
'](0 out of 18): Socket operation on non-socket

bluepill:/lib/nessus/plugins# nasl -t 10.129.53.61 msrpc_dcom2.nasl
[19418] plug_set_key:send(0)['1 SMB/KB824146=1;
'](0 out of 18): Socket operation on non-socket

bluepill:/lib/nessus/plugins# nasl -t 10.129.53.61 msrpc_dcom.nasl
Success

C:\Program Files\KB824146Scan>KB824146Scan.exe 10.129.53.61

Microsoft (R) KB824146 Scanner Version 1.00.0249 for 80x86
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation 2003. All rights reserved.

<+> Starting scan (timeout = 5000 ms)

Checking 10.129.53.61
10.129.53.61: patched with KB824146 and KB823980

<-> Scan completed

> What operating system is running on the hosts which are supposed to be
> patched ?

I'm about 90% certain that they are XP Pro SP1.  I can try to get better info if it's 
important.

Regards,
John

Reply via email to